Each
lecture (CM) has a contemporary
subject attached to it, to be debated in a tutorial (TD) two weeks
later, in
the form of arguments for and against a motion.
For example, the motion for the tutorial in week 4 (2-7 March) is
related to
the first and second lectures and might be: “This
House believes that the French and
British have a lot in common.”
For
homework:
Two
people volunteer or are designated to propose the
motion. Drawing on lectures,
books, the media and any other sources that seem appropriate, they will
prepare
the evidence that the French and British do
have a lot in common.
Also
for homework, two people volunteer or
are designated to oppose the motion.
Drawing on the first lecture, books, the media and other source
material, they
will prepare the evidence that the French and British do
not have a lot in common.
The
rest of the class prepares the
contours of the motion, finding arguments and evidence for and against,
and preparing a short presentation of the motion.
In the
tutorial:
1.
The motion is read out and a vote is
taken to see how many people are for and how many against.
2.
A student is selected at random to present
the contours of the motion. She/he will discuss the terms to be
defined. (What
do we mean by “British”? By “French”? How much is “a lot”?) The
presenter gets a mark.
3.
Proposer 1 gives 2-3 arguments and
produces evidence for the motion, and
gets a mark.
4.
Opposer 1 gives 2-3 arguments and
produces evidence against the motion,
and gets a mark.
5.
The motion is thrown open to the floor
(the rest of the class) for discussion and questions. Proposers and
opposers
take notes but do not participate. No marks for this part.
6.
Proposer 2 responds and may produce new
arguments and evidence, and gets a mark.
7.
Opposer 2 responds and may produce new
arguments and evidence, and gets a mark.
8.
A student is chosen at random to summarize
the arguments for. Another is chosen at random to summarize the
arguments
against. Both get marks.
9.
A final vote is taken, to see how many
people have been convinced by the arguments of one or the other side.
4
designated people and 3 random people
will be given marks. A student who is absent or unable to produce an
argument
will get 0/20. Normal attendance numbers in tutorials mean that by the
end of
the semester everyone should have 3-4 marks, based on prepared and
class work.
The lowest of these will be discarded, and the rest will form an
average which
will count for 40% of the continuous assessment mark. In week 14, an
undiscussed motion will be submitted, to which each student will
respond in
writing by presenting either the
arguments for or the arguments
against the motion. This written work will count for 60% of the final
mark.
Suggestions and
queries
are very welcome at
this
address
|
|
|